Which statement correctly reflects the tattoo policy for hires after January 9, 2010?

Which statement correctly reflects the tattoo policy for hires after January 9, 2010?

• A. Two visible tattoos no larger than 3x5
• B. Three visible tattoos no larger than 3x3
• C. No tattoos allowed
• D. Two visible tattoos no larger than 3x3

Answer: (D)

Two visible tattoos no larger than 3x3 is the correct reflection because the policy allows only a limited number of visible tattoos and imposes a size cap on each. After January 9, 2010, hires may have up to two tattoos that can be seen in a standard uniform, with each tattoo measuring 3 inches by 3 inches or smaller. The other statements don't fit because they either permit more tattoos than allowed, or allow larger tattoos, or ban tattoos altogether. For example, two tattoos but larger than 3x3 would violate the size limit; three visible tattoos exceed the allowed count; and no tattoos allowed contradicts the allowance for up to two tattoos within the size constraint.

Two visible tattoos no larger than 3x3 is the correct reflection because the policy allows only a limited number of visible tattoos and imposes a size cap on each. After January 9, 2010, hires may have up to two tattoos that can be seen in a standard uniform, with each tattoo measuring 3 inches by 3 inches or smaller.

The other statements don't fit because they either permit more tattoos than allowed, or allow larger tattoos, or ban tattoos altogether. For example, two tattoos but larger than 3x3 would violate the size limit; three visible tattoos exceed the allowed count; and no tattoos allowed contradicts the allowance for up to two tattoos within the size constraint.